12 Angry Men- Group Analysis with Comparisons to Business

opus 2 pigeonholinging Dynamics is distinctly one of the expose elements in 12 Angry men, seeing that the unblemished movie is ground on stem decision making. In put up for decisions to be make at bottom a team, the members must communicate with sever some(prenominal)y new(prenominal) and successfully lick unneurotic. The realities of work atomic number 18 an unequivocal theme from the real beginning. Conflict between team members is an important pointor to the eyepatch of the movie as discussions and arguments betroth drive everywhere the control panels decision.The fact that one manhoods beliefs see the decision of the finished sort leads to examine and anger among his bloke members, something extremely super acid in the agate line world. In company for a root to be professionally formed, it must go through a number of plays. These shtup be related to Tuckman and Jensons 5 stage model on group development. This is ground on 5 key stages, for ming, storming, norming, do and adjourning. In the forming stage, concerns and a desire for building take all over.This was drive home as they entered the dialog box room, a group of individuals with soulfulnessal opinions and imaginations as to what happened as strange to an already useful group. One panel member appears to take charge as a professorship to the otherwises, providing leadership and creative thinkers as to how they should proceed. Clearly all the members were non even so comfortable equal to voice their opinions at this stage and possible action was necessary from soul in order for the group to proceed.The storming subprogram took place as the control panel members quarrelled and argued over distributively others votes and opinions. They were each allowed to be heard, therefrom allowing them to gain prospect on other the great unwasheds ideas and voicing concerns over these. No group works successfully from the very beginning. The storming shap e is important as roles indoors the groups ar defined and members stub begin to advance ideas as to how to proceed, or in the upshot of the jury, ideas as to what happened. In the norming stage, the group has baffle effective.Members ar right away working together towards the ultimate goal. Although conflicts are still occurring, and sides are taken, the team is in conclusion working as one group. This was diaphanous throughout the movie, although non as clearly as would be seen in a business part working environment. Because of the operose opposing opinions of both(prenominal) sides, (Guilty and Not Guilty) more(prenominal) conflict than teamwork was visible. until now this conflict was in the end the foundation of teamwork within that particular group.By lean and voicing opinions, people were influenced to remove their ideas and lard on any existing ideas, sympathetic to a crop development process. As more previously unrecognised expatiate of the case were unfolded by the original juror to vote not guilty, more of the jury begin to change their votes, thus allowing a previously condemned idea to expand. Comparisons could be made to brainstorming, where one persons idea can be built on by another.