Peer Review for Classmate Research Proposal - Peer 2 Essay

Peer Review for Classmate Research Proposal - Peer 2 - Essay ExamplePossibly, mentioning the take up age period for telecommunicateing could have positively impacted the message. Moreover, the author makes a contradictory argument in paragraph two. It sounds ambiguous to discourage netmailing during both working hours and non-working hours. So, when employees should sent and/or receive emails?As mention earlier, the topic is vital. The author clearly represents the proposal portraying precise sense of purpose. According to the author email communication is essential and can break organizations effectiveness. However, due to misuse email communications impact negatively on companies and manger still assume that email communication is basic. This challenge is clearly represented elaborated and so is the solutionNotably, the solution is kept clear there are several modes of offering the learn hence leaving the manager to rationally choose the best. Notably, the author makes a com manding request to managers to incorporate email training in the organizations operations, by non giving any other option to solve the problem. Moreover, by elaborating how training induces email etiquette, a driver of effectiveness in email communication, the solutions make a lot of sense.Forlornly, the author made the proposal sound as purely personal opinion. No sources were included in the text. Despite including the reference page, the author failed to greet borrowed content and ideas.The paper is standard, but could still make more impact if improved. Grammar mistakes were minimal and possibly negligible though they can still be corrected. To improve the papers reputation, its recommended that the author adjusts the introduction, making it more captivating. Possibly, the author might avoid generalizing the idea but instead develop an optimal amount of time to dedicate to emailing. The timing